Direct Payment Program in Sharkey County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 299
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Sharkey County, Mississippi totaled $49,632,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Howle Planting Company | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $779,286 |
22 | C & B Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $771,445 |
23 | Rkb Farms Partnership | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $659,918 |
24 | L & R Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $625,519 |
25 | Dean Dean & Dean | Panther Burn, MS 38765 | $618,349 |
26 | Sharkey Planting Company | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $598,476 |
27 | Hollingsworth & Company | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $596,561 |
28 | Helena Partners | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $576,731 |
29 | Halzac Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $560,808 |
30 | Little Panther Plantation | Leland, MS 38756 | $537,500 |
31 | Panther Creek Plantation | Leland, MS 38756 | $536,252 |
32 | Goodman Associates | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $513,550 |
33 | J & L Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $443,546 |
34 | Ralph W Mcgee II | Leland, MS 38756 | $432,039 |
35 | Clark And Clark Partnership | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $422,927 |
36 | Wood Land Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $414,002 |
37 | Patton Farms Joint Venture | Nitta Yuma, MS 38721 | $384,348 |
38 | Sunshine Planting Company | Brandon, MS 39043 | $368,031 |
39 | Clark Planting Partnership | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $353,615 |
40 | Coghlan & Sons | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $349,460 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”