Market Gains in Sunflower County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 306
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Sunflower County, Mississippi totaled $19,180,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Reed Farms Inc | Boyle, MS 38730 | $102,140 |
62 | Mccaskill Farms | Leland, MS 38756 | $97,975 |
63 | Legg Farms II | Drew, MS 38737 | $97,646 |
64 | Robertson Planting | Indianola, MS 38751 | $96,742 |
65 | Booger Den Farms Partnership | Minter City, MS 38944 | $94,591 |
66 | C & G Farms Partnership | Orange Beach, AL 36561 | $91,540 |
67 | Tkt Farm | Shaw, MS 38773 | $91,253 |
68 | Jeffrey Downs | Shaw, MS 38773 | $87,102 |
69 | C C Richardson | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $86,906 |
70 | Roger D Earls | Doddsville, MS 38736 | $85,990 |
71 | James R Carr | Minter City, MS 38944 | $83,263 |
72 | J B Dodd Jr | Sunflower, MS 38778 | $82,923 |
73 | Allen Planting Company | Kingston Springs, TN 37082 | $78,757 |
74 | Heathman Planting Company | Indianola, MS 38751 | $78,011 |
75 | Tidmore Farms Partnership | Merigold, MS 38759 | $73,307 |
76 | Carr & Carr Inc | Minter City, MS 38944 | $70,800 |
77 | Shurden Farming Co | Drew, MS 38737 | $69,792 |
78 | Stafford Shurden Farms Inc | Drew, MS 38737 | $69,622 |
79 | Clarence Allen Mallette | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $67,649 |
80 | Everette O Eastland | Doddsville, MS 38736 | $67,563 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”