Counter Cyclical Program in Sunflower County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 797
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Sunflower County, Mississippi totaled $64,889,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Saunders Farms | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $123,162 |
102 | Dl Farms | Shaw, MS 38773 | $122,638 |
103 | Greg Burton Farms | Isola, MS 38754 | $122,299 |
104 | Mid-south Family Farms | Ripley, TN 38063 | $122,160 |
105 | Redden Farms | Boyle, MS 38730 | $122,063 |
106 | Redd & Son Farms | Shaw, MS 38773 | $121,396 |
107 | Rise To Set Farms | Webb, MS 38966 | $120,238 |
108 | Smyly Planting Co | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $118,720 |
109 | James A Chandler | Ruleville, MS 38771 | $117,992 |
110 | Jerry Nobile Farms Inc | Moorhead, MS 38761 | $117,466 |
111 | Double R Farm | Drew, MS 38737 | $117,217 |
112 | Booger Den Farms Partnership | Minter City, MS 38944 | $112,664 |
113 | Cood-penne-smith Farms | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $111,208 |
114 | Chandler And Chandler Farm Ptr | Drew, MS 38737 | $109,268 |
115 | Hurdle Farms Family Partnership | Rossville, TN 38066 | $108,860 |
116 | Grittman Farms | Drew, MS 38737 | $106,042 |
117 | J Marshall Riddick Jr | Rome, MS 38768 | $105,748 |
118 | C & L Farms | Merigold, MS 38759 | $104,718 |
119 | Tkt Farms | Shaw, MS 38773 | $104,294 |
120 | Roberts Brothers | Moorhead, MS 38761 | $103,331 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”