Total Disaster Programs in Sunflower County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 734
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Sunflower County, Mississippi totaled $27,450,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Fairview Pltg Co | Indianola, MS 38751 | $66,259 |
122 | J O & H C Eastland Inc | Doddsville, MS 38736 | $65,510 |
123 | Double R Farm | Drew, MS 38737 | $64,829 |
124 | C & C Planting Co | Ripley, TN 38063 | $64,527 |
125 | T & D Fish Farms Inc | Inverness, MS 38753 | $64,139 |
126 | Parker Planting Partners | Sunflower, MS 38778 | $63,929 |
127 | Miller Planting Company | Indianola, MS 38751 | $63,782 |
128 | Grittman Farms | Drew, MS 38737 | $62,620 |
129 | Wayne Parks | Drew, MS 38737 | $62,578 |
130 | Round Lake Farms A Partnership | Indianola, MS 38751 | $62,238 |
131 | Camponovo Farms Inc | Shelby, MS 38774 | $61,745 |
132 | Adrain Earl Nelson | Sondheimer, LA 71276 | $61,575 |
133 | Roberts Brothers | Moorhead, MS 38761 | $61,451 |
134 | Ray Mabry Farms Inc | Tutwiler, MS 38963 | $61,377 |
135 | Donald A Lee | Doddsville, MS 38736 | $60,354 |
136 | Mary Susan Johnson | Shelby, MS 38774 | $59,932 |
137 | Jack Westerfield Planting LLC | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $59,861 |
138 | Owen Planting Company | Drew, MS 38737 | $59,563 |
139 | Burton Farms | Sunflower, MS 38778 | $59,451 |
140 | Booger Den Farms Partnership | Minter City, MS 38944 | $59,015 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”