Farm Subsidy information
Tallahatchie County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Tallahatchie County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 598
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tallahatchie County, Mississippi totaled $16,376,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | J & J Farms, A Partnership | Charleston, MS 38921 | $29,112 |
82 | Palo Alto Plantation Inc | Minter City, MS 38944 | $28,574 |
83 | Bailey Brake Farm Inc | Flora, MS 39071 | $28,440 |
84 | Moak Farm Family Limited Partnership | Indianola, MS 38751 | $28,054 |
85 | Mitchell W Black | Madison, MS 39110 | $27,372 |
86 | Casburn Company Inc | Sumner, MS 38957 | $26,932 |
87 | Sims Howard Hawkins Jr | Batesville, MS 38606 | $26,278 |
88 | Kimberly H Mcwhorter | Grenada, MS 38901 | $26,232 |
89 | Ray Rounsaville | Rossville, TN 38066 | $24,789 |
90 | West Oxford Properties LLC | Oxford, MS 38655 | $24,078 |
91 | Ala Real Estate LLC | Boyle, MS 38730 | $24,063 |
92 | Raymond Wilson | Olive Branch, MS 38654 | $24,056 |
93 | Countiss Farm | Glendora, MS 38928 | $23,682 |
94 | M & A Farm | Charleston, MS 38921 | $23,000 |
95 | Mike Swindoll Farms | Tutwiler, MS 38963 | $22,876 |
96 | Geneva B Allison Family Trust | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $22,693 |
97 | James W Crowley | Enid, MS 38927 | $22,523 |
98 | David C Sheley | Sardis, MS 38666 | $21,987 |
99 | Joseph R Murphey Jr | Tippo, MS 38962 | $21,264 |
100 | W Lacy Murphey | Tippo, MS 38962 | $21,227 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”