Farm Subsidy information
Tallahatchie County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Tallahatchie County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 598
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tallahatchie County, Mississippi totaled $16,376,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Regions Bank ** | Grenada, MS 38901 | $951,009 |
2 | First National Bank Of Clarksdale ** | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $894,088 |
3 | First South Farm Credit Aca ** | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $361,376 |
4 | Dixie Farms | Vance, MS 38964 | $252,152 |
5 | Guaranty Bank & Trust Co ** | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $247,065 |
6 | State Bank & Trust Company ** | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $217,964 |
7 | Moore Farms | Oakland, MS 38948 | $203,903 |
8 | Paul Fortner Farms Partnership | Sumner, MS 38957 | $183,251 |
9 | Two Brooks Farm | Sumner, MS 38957 | $162,319 |
10 | Smd Farms | Tutwiler, MS 38963 | $158,855 |
11 | Flautt Farms | Webb, MS 38966 | $156,284 |
12 | Brazil Planting Company | Drew, MS 38737 | $138,149 |
13 | Hardy Farms | Tippo, MS 38962 | $105,749 |
14 | Pushen & Pullen Farms | Sumner, MS 38957 | $105,738 |
15 | M & W Partnership | Philipp, MS 38950 | $104,628 |
16 | Chamblis Farms | Webb, MS 38966 | $101,524 |
17 | Citizens Bank & Trust Co ** | Marks, MS 38646 | $100,356 |
18 | C & E Farms Partnership | Coffeeville, MS 38922 | $91,523 |
19 | Eddie Reynolds | Charleston, MS 38921 | $90,982 |
20 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $88,404 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>