Farm Subsidy information
Tate County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Tate County, Mississippi, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 341
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tate County, Mississippi totaled $3,148,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jimmie Sneed | Coldwater, MS 38618 | $20,922 |
22 | Dennis C Paulk | Senatobia, MS 38668 | $20,276 |
23 | Allen Sneed | Coldwater, MS 38618 | $19,128 |
24 | Miles Allison | Sarah, MS 38665 | $17,989 |
25 | Benjamin Hamilton | Coldwater, MS 38618 | $17,227 |
26 | Roger Davis | Coldwater, MS 38618 | $17,140 |
27 | Delton Davis | Dundee, MS 38626 | $17,140 |
28 | Sheryl O Bowen | Holly Springs, MS 39735 | $16,809 |
29 | Charles M Edwards | Senatobia, MS 38668 | $16,785 |
30 | , | $16,559 | |
31 | Sandy Ridge Farms | Senatobia, MS 38668 | $16,481 |
32 | Alice Sides | Como, MS 38619 | $16,424 |
33 | Lee Howell | Senatobia, MS 38668 | $15,716 |
34 | Sides Cedar Ridge LLC | Jackson, MS 39202 | $15,068 |
35 | Larry Mcfarlin | Coldwater, MS 38618 | $14,156 |
36 | Robert Eddins | Coldwater, MS 38618 | $13,934 |
37 | White Brothers | Senatobia, MS 38668 | $13,334 |
38 | Rickey Bishop | Olive Branch, MS 38654 | $13,055 |
39 | Robert L Oaks | Coldwater, MS 38618 | $12,893 |
40 | David Shackleford | Coldwater, MS 38618 | $12,699 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”