Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Tunica County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 102
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Tunica County, Mississippi totaled $2,128,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | White & White | Tunica, MS 38676 | $27,082 |
22 | Harrison Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $23,870 |
23 | Estate Of Charles G Melton | Tunica, MS 38676 | $22,438 |
24 | Myers Farm | Dundee, MS 38626 | $21,859 |
25 | Mary Mac Inc | Tunica, MS 38676 | $21,704 |
26 | Canon Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $20,388 |
27 | Ray Smith | Dundee, MS 38626 | $19,103 |
28 | Abbay Ag Services LLC | Walls, MS 38680 | $17,584 |
29 | J & P Farms Inc | Batesville, MS 38606 | $17,432 |
30 | Steel Bridge Farms Ptr | Crenshaw, MS 38621 | $17,226 |
31 | T E Swindoll & Co | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $16,938 |
32 | Sides Farms | Dundee, MS 38626 | $16,799 |
33 | Big 6 Farms II | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $16,793 |
34 | Leatherman Family Tunica Partnership Lp | Memphis, TN 38157 | $15,689 |
35 | Ltf III | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $13,542 |
36 | Charles B Graves Jr | Tunica, MS 38676 | $12,281 |
37 | James A Pegram III | Tunica, MS 38676 | $10,994 |
38 | Peter Dulaney Farms | Coldwater, MS 38618 | $10,015 |
39 | Irwin Co | Memphis, TN 38197 | $9,542 |
40 | Berry Farm Enterprises | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $9,429 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”