Total Commodity Programs in Tunica County, Mississippi, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 80
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Tunica County, Mississippi totaled $674,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Oneida Farms | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $11,950 |
22 | Mississippi Land Bank Aca ** | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $11,552 |
23 | Three Pak | Tunica, MS 38676 | $10,052 |
24 | Dac Farms | Dundee, MS 38626 | $8,724 |
25 | Horseshoe Bottom Farms LLC | Tunica, MS 38676 | $7,982 |
26 | Sides Farms | Dundee, MS 38626 | $7,961 |
27 | Delta Ag | Como, MS 38619 | $7,556 |
28 | Limerick Farms II | Tunica, MS 38676 | $6,986 |
29 | Old Yocona River Planting Company | Marks, MS 38646 | $6,691 |
30 | Planters Bank & Trust Company ** | Indianola, MS 38751 | $6,683 |
31 | Linville Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $6,634 |
32 | Beaver Dam Planting Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $6,263 |
33 | Mclean Grain | Tunica, MS 38676 | $6,210 |
34 | Dundee Farms | Dundee, MS 38626 | $5,968 |
35 | Woolfolk Farm & Land Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $5,727 |
36 | Peter Dulaney Farms | Coldwater, MS 38618 | $5,414 |
37 | Leatherman Family Tunica Partnership Lp | Memphis, TN 38157 | $5,334 |
38 | The Bibb Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $4,639 |
39 | Vaughn Brothers Farms Farming | Crenshaw, MS 38621 | $4,596 |
40 | Little Thailand Farms II | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $4,465 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”