Farm Subsidy information
Tunica County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Tunica County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 689
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tunica County, Mississippi totaled $398,499,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Canon Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $11,189,646 |
2 | Bowdre Place | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $10,824,556 |
3 | Berry Farm Enterprises | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $10,799,396 |
4 | Battle Associates | Tunica, MS 38676 | $10,320,995 |
5 | Riverfield Farms | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $8,810,597 |
6 | Myers Farm | Dundee, MS 38626 | $8,327,618 |
7 | Maud Farms | Dundee, MS 38626 | $7,975,090 |
8 | Brad Cobb Farms 1993 | Tunica, MS 38676 | $6,506,085 |
9 | Whitten Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $6,302,190 |
10 | Bryant Farms | Sledge, MS 38670 | $6,168,075 |
11 | Bcf-09 | Tunica, MS 38676 | $6,015,439 |
12 | M P Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $5,764,671 |
13 | Mclean Grain | Tunica, MS 38676 | $5,569,071 |
14 | Michael E Johnson & Son | Tunica, MS 38676 | $5,560,357 |
15 | Dundee Farms | Dundee, MS 38626 | $4,770,172 |
16 | T E Swindoll & Co | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $4,657,089 |
17 | Staple Cotton Discount Corp | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $4,479,559 |
18 | The Bibb Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $4,402,266 |
19 | Cypress Brake Planting Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $4,388,805 |
20 | Perry Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $4,182,893 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>