Emergency Conservation Program in Union County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 49
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Union County, Mississippi totaled $163,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert L Porter | Myrtle, MS 38650 | $2,467 |
22 | Willie D Hall | New Albany, MS 38652 | $2,402 |
23 | Charles Mitchell Jumper | Etta, MS 38627 | $2,394 |
24 | Porter Brothers | Myrtle, MS 38650 | $2,179 |
25 | Bricyn Farms LLC | New Albany, MS 38652 | $2,134 |
26 | James B Randle Jr | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $2,063 |
27 | B A Teague Revocable Trust | New Albany, MS 38652 | $1,791 |
28 | Frances W Hill | New Albany, MS 38652 | $1,782 |
29 | Joseph Mcgaha | New Albany, MS 38652 | $1,688 |
30 | Benny Sappington | New Albany, MS 38652 | $1,649 |
31 | Robert M And Norma J Brownlee Revocable Trust | Myrtle, MS 38650 | $1,523 |
32 | Christopher B Holloway | Baldwyn, MS 38824 | $1,500 |
33 | Stephens Farms LLC | Memphis, TN 38111 | $1,365 |
34 | Bobby Joe Tate | New Albany, MS 38652 | $1,000 |
35 | J C Goudelock | Myrtle, MS 38650 | $835 |
36 | Leonard L Wilson | Myrtle, MS 38650 | $814 |
37 | Danny Jordan | New Albany, MS 38652 | $761 |
38 | Mary Frances Shelton-kerby | Michie, TN 38357 | $630 |
39 | Blufard Wells Jr | New Albany, MS 38652 | $585 |
40 | David Elmo Smith | New Albany, MS 38652 | $501 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”