Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Union County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 267
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Union County, Mississippi totaled $306,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lamar Frazier | New Albany, MS 38652 | $22,475 |
2 | Larry Coker | Blue Springs, MS 38828 | $17,935 |
3 | Eugene Chism | Ripley, MS 38663 | $11,677 |
4 | Ronnie Chism | New Albany, MS 38652 | $11,407 |
5 | Stephens Farms LLC | Memphis, TN 38111 | $10,060 |
6 | Collins Farm | Myrtle, MS 38650 | $8,852 |
7 | Daniel Pitts | New Albany, MS 38652 | $8,609 |
8 | Porter Brothers | Myrtle, MS 38650 | $8,265 |
9 | Phil D Adair | New Albany, MS 38652 | $8,163 |
10 | Young Farms Rowcrop, LLC | New Albany, MS 38652 | $8,090 |
11 | Brewer Bottom Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $7,544 |
12 | Jerry Tom Haynes | New Albany, MS 38652 | $7,489 |
13 | Edward R Grant | New Albany, MS 38652 | $7,333 |
14 | Steve Adams | Blue Springs, MS 38828 | $6,477 |
15 | Imc Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $6,438 |
16 | D & B Farms | New Albany, MS 38652 | $6,178 |
17 | Mccord Farms, LLC | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $6,005 |
18 | Pannell Farms Ptrn | New Albany, MS 38652 | $5,953 |
19 | Frank S Wilbanks, Jr, Revocable T | New Albany, MS 38652 | $5,953 |
20 | Terry L Pitts | New Albany, MS 38652 | $5,118 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>