Cotton Ginning Program in Washington County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 22
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Washington County, Mississippi totaled $1,347,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Vanlandingham Farms | Leland, MS 38756 | $241,888 |
2 | Ganier Planting Company | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $164,526 |
3 | Alcorn Farms Partnership | Grace, MS 38745 | $129,018 |
4 | Coco Planting Co | Avon, MS 38723 | $125,806 |
5 | Gypsy Farms | Greenville, MS 38703 | $122,894 |
6 | Sunshine Planting Company | Brandon, MS 39043 | $90,694 |
7 | Jake & Helen Redecop | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $70,032 |
8 | Baggett Farms | Greenville, MS 38704 | $69,084 |
9 | Triple C Farms | Leland, MS 38756 | $53,232 |
10 | J & M Peters Farms LLC | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $51,196 |
11 | Triple C Planting Co | Leland, MS 38756 | $34,971 |
12 | Denaro Farms | Leland, MS 38756 | $31,240 |
13 | Southern Planting Company | Scott, MS 38772 | $30,369 |
14 | David T Cochran Jr | Avon, MS 38723 | $26,593 |
15 | Bretlind Farms Partners | Leland, MS 38756 | $25,908 |
16 | Timothy Zepponi | Leland, MS 38756 | $24,947 |
17 | Charles Hampton Jacks | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $20,676 |
18 | John E Turnipseed | Greenville, MS 38704 | $14,874 |
19 | Russell W Stigall III | Greenville, MS 38704 | $8,259 |
20 | V Carson Johnson | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $5,208 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>