Counter Cyclical Program in Washington County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 475
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Washington County, Mississippi totaled $83,571,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Coco Planting Co | Avon, MS 38723 | $1,020,302 |
22 | Fontenot And Fontenot | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $1,018,264 |
23 | Greenland Planting Co | Leland, MS 38756 | $988,639 |
24 | Ross Plantation Partnership | Greenville, MS 38701 | $968,323 |
25 | Triple C Planting Co | Leland, MS 38756 | $964,893 |
26 | Hollingsworth & Company | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $918,076 |
27 | Hunter Farms | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $888,236 |
28 | Oglesby Farms Partnership | Chatham, MS 38731 | $878,341 |
29 | Wood Land Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $877,682 |
30 | B & H Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $873,837 |
31 | Isola Plantation | Leland, MS 38756 | $869,296 |
32 | Triple C Farms | Leland, MS 38756 | $856,624 |
33 | Bruton Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $837,046 |
34 | Avondale Farms | Greenville, MS 38703 | $835,450 |
35 | Bogue Planting Company | Leland, MS 38756 | $830,919 |
36 | Capstone Partners | Scott, MS 38772 | $826,400 |
37 | Coghlan Farms | Benoit, MS 38725 | $765,596 |
38 | Bourbon Plantation | Leland, MS 38756 | $760,840 |
39 | Huntington Plantation | Greenville, MS 38704 | $742,424 |
40 | Cecil Burch Farms Partnership | Scott, MS 38772 | $732,019 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”