Farm Subsidy information
Washington County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Washington County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 374
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washington County, Mississippi totaled $29,039,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Fratesi Planting Co II | Leland, MS 38756 | $154,727 |
42 | Wade Mccollum Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $147,679 |
43 | Btt LLC | Leland, MS 38756 | $147,492 |
44 | Coco Planting Co | Avon, MS 38723 | $142,723 |
45 | Southern Agricultural Credit Corp ** | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $141,650 |
46 | Southern Bancorp Bank ** | Trumann, AR 72472 | $141,586 |
47 | Theunissen Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $141,115 |
48 | Nelson King Farms | Chatham, MS 38731 | $135,604 |
49 | Wood Land Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $134,304 |
50 | New Panther Farms Partnership | Panther Burn, MS 38765 | $134,298 |
51 | Tj Richard Farms Partnership | Greenville, MS 38703 | $132,751 |
52 | Daybreak Farming Partners | Leland, MS 38756 | $128,988 |
53 | Mike Theunissen Farms Inc | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $118,734 |
54 | Davis Davis & Davis | Avon, MS 38723 | $118,617 |
55 | Ross Plantation Partnership | Greenville, MS 38701 | $115,005 |
56 | Ganier Planting Company | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $109,606 |
57 | Walker Farm Enterprises | Stoneville, MS 38776 | $107,516 |
58 | Azlin Planting Co | Leland, MS 38756 | $107,269 |
59 | Mark B Dill | Neosho Rapids, KS 66864 | $103,282 |
60 | Weissinger Wynn & Assc | Greenville, MS 38701 | $100,944 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”