Farm Subsidy information
Washington County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Washington County, Mississippi, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 280
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washington County, Mississippi totaled $16,825,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | E G Nelson Inc | Chatham, MS 38731 | $7,403 |
142 | Eric Albert Nichols | Greenville, MS 38701 | $7,265 |
143 | , | $7,265 | |
144 | Alice Faye Fee Estate | Avon, MS 38723 | $6,895 |
145 | Wilmont Land Co LLC | Leland, MS 38756 | $6,814 |
146 | , | $6,752 | |
147 | Joseph Barron Fontenot | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $6,748 |
148 | Homewood Farms Inc | Greenville, MS 38703 | $6,726 |
149 | Glenbar Plantation LLC | Greenville, MS 38703 | $6,663 |
150 | Bastion Grain Inc | Greenville, MS 38701 | $6,570 |
151 | Walker Farm Enterprises | Stoneville, MS 38776 | $6,554 |
152 | First South Farm Credit Aca ** | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $6,424 |
153 | Frazier Living Trust | Florence, MS 39073 | $6,391 |
154 | Nell Livingston - Nell Livingston Revocable Trust | Leland, MS 38756 | $6,218 |
155 | , | $6,084 | |
156 | Helm Plantation Partnership | Leland, MS 38756 | $5,996 |
157 | Wade A Giesbrecht | Leland, MS 38756 | $5,791 |
158 | Looney Farms Partnership | Leland, MS 38756 | $5,662 |
159 | Deloach Cope Jr Dba Arcola Plantation | Arcola, MS 38722 | $5,581 |
160 | Dillard & Co Inc | Leland, MS 38756 | $5,535 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”