Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Washington County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 350
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Washington County, Mississippi totaled $19,618,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Garry & Dawn Nipper Ptrs | Chatham, MS 38731 | $228,580 |
| 22 | Wood Land Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $226,816 |
| 23 | Hunter Farms | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $211,874 |
| 24 | Vanlandingham Farms | Leland, MS 38756 | $199,336 |
| 25 | Middleton Planting Company | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $191,746 |
| 26 | Bretlind Farms Partners | Leland, MS 38756 | $190,596 |
| 27 | Ganier Planting Company | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $190,066 |
| 28 | Steele Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $188,041 |
| 29 | Timothy Zepponi | Leland, MS 38756 | $187,713 |
| 30 | Daybreak Farming Partners | Leland, MS 38756 | $186,610 |
| 31 | Oglesby Farms Partnership | Chatham, MS 38731 | $183,695 |
| 32 | Greenland Planting Co | Leland, MS 38756 | $182,960 |
| 33 | Patrick Smith | Greenville, MS 38703 | $182,951 |
| 34 | Palasini Farms | Leland, MS 38756 | $179,187 |
| 35 | Triple C Farms | Leland, MS 38756 | $176,449 |
| 36 | Promise Land Farms | Greenville, MS 38701 | $166,235 |
| 37 | Bourbon Plantation | Leland, MS 38756 | $161,680 |
| 38 | Theunissen Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $156,170 |
| 39 | Ross Plantation Partnership | Greenville, MS 38701 | $155,786 |
| 40 | Opossum Ridge Planting Co | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $154,969 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf