Total Disaster Programs in Yazoo County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 724
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Yazoo County, Mississippi totaled $31,954,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Cotton Creek Farms | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $353,690 |
22 | Horseshoe Joint Venture | Tchula, MS 39169 | $335,890 |
23 | Swarek Partnership | Gulfport, MS 39501 | $334,856 |
24 | Erickson Planting Company | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $333,595 |
25 | Yazoo River Farms | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $326,985 |
26 | Oak Valley Partners | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $296,835 |
27 | Scott E Collins | Bentonia, MS 39040 | $288,283 |
28 | Goodman Sod And Planting Company | Murfreesboro, TN 37129 | $283,983 |
29 | Seward & Son Planting Company | Louise, MS 39097 | $279,702 |
30 | Pillow Farms | Satartia, MS 39162 | $261,802 |
31 | Bonnie Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $260,683 |
32 | Jordan Planting Company | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $259,966 |
33 | Huff Company II | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $259,753 |
34 | T & S Farms | Satartia, MS 39162 | $246,170 |
35 | Colby Company Iv | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $239,377 |
36 | Sunshine Planting Company | Brandon, MS 39043 | $232,827 |
37 | Billy J Ragland | Bentonia, MS 39040 | $218,616 |
38 | Fouche Farms II | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $206,282 |
39 | Huff Yc Company | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $206,054 |
40 | Bobby Ragland Jr | Satartia, MS 39162 | $205,786 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”