Counter Cyclical Program in Yazoo County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 719
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Yazoo County, Mississippi totaled $76,363,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Roger Hancock | Bentonia, MS 39040 | $234,627 |
82 | Marvin O'reilly Farms | Pickens, MS 39146 | $233,569 |
83 | Blackjack Inc | Vaughan, MS 39179 | $231,980 |
84 | Rocky Bayou Inc | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $230,442 |
85 | Robert Lee Thompson III | Pickens, MS 39146 | $227,999 |
86 | Jeff Vandevere Farms Inc | Benton, MS 39039 | $225,570 |
87 | William C Dorris III | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $223,193 |
88 | Clayton Swayze II | Benton, MS 39039 | $221,781 |
89 | Smythe & Sons | Leland, MS 38756 | $217,901 |
90 | Charles L Graeber Jr Dba Floddenf | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $215,864 |
91 | Edward Greer | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $211,820 |
92 | Section 20 Inc | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $211,355 |
93 | Mark Mcleod Farms | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $207,467 |
94 | Roy D Ward | Benton, MS 39039 | $207,319 |
95 | Kbs Farms | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $201,957 |
96 | B & K Farms Partnership | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $201,660 |
97 | Huff Company II | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $190,770 |
98 | Lambert Inc | Benton, MS 39039 | $184,974 |
99 | J & J Farms | Brandon, MS 39047 | $181,076 |
100 | Harry H Pepper | Canton, MS 39046 | $176,958 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”