Counter Cyclical Program in Yazoo County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 719
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Yazoo County, Mississippi totaled $76,363,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | C A Hall III | Jackson, MS 39236 | $95,197 |
142 | Christopher White Dba C W Farms | Satartia, MS 39162 | $91,527 |
143 | Charles William Perry Jr | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $91,189 |
144 | Haynes Farms Partnership | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $90,199 |
145 | Sandy L Ragland | Satartia, MS 39162 | $84,254 |
146 | David T Slack Jr | Pickens, MS 39146 | $84,131 |
147 | W E Edge | Vaughan, MS 39179 | $83,442 |
148 | Douglas L Deason | Baton Rouge, LA 70810 | $83,422 |
149 | Hugh L Mathews III | Benton, MS 39039 | $81,642 |
150 | Breakwater Cattle Company | Benton, MS 39039 | $79,850 |
151 | Charles L Graeber Jr Dba Floddenf | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $79,157 |
152 | Quail Haven Inc | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $76,511 |
153 | Eunice Rusche Dixon Qtip Trust | Madison, MS 39110 | $76,235 |
154 | Trudy D Fisher | Ridgeland, MS 39157 | $71,990 |
155 | Killebrew Cotton Co | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $71,480 |
156 | David F Berry III | Benton, MS 39039 | $69,225 |
157 | Roy Heidel Jr | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $67,869 |
158 | Frank Trammell | Bentonia, MS 39040 | $66,862 |
159 | Steve Coody | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $65,312 |
160 | Rebecca D Stricklin | Satartia, MS 39162 | $65,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”