Market Gains in Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 9,375
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Missouri totaled $160,627,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Missouri Delta Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $5,159,953 |
2 | Tanner Planting Co II | Bernie, MO 63822 | $656,640 |
3 | Strobel Farms | Bell City, MO 63735 | $651,774 |
4 | Pearson Farms | Matthews, MO 63867 | $623,942 |
5 | Harris Farms | Senath, MO 63876 | $611,805 |
6 | T & P Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $584,004 |
7 | Dale Farming Company | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $495,244 |
8 | Brian Shramek Farms | Kingdom City, MO 65262 | $488,453 |
9 | Parker Brothers Farm | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $470,223 |
10 | Berry Brothers Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $457,603 |
11 | Gastler Bros Farming | Martinsburg, MO 65264 | $452,159 |
12 | Sides Farms | Hayti, MO 63851 | $444,632 |
13 | Parker & Jones Farms | Senath, MO 63876 | $433,722 |
14 | Rebel Farms | Essex, MO 63846 | $400,783 |
15 | Turnage Farms | Hayti, MO 63851 | $399,699 |
16 | J J Farms | Clarkton, MO 63837 | $383,391 |
17 | Robinson Bros | Cooter, MO 63839 | $361,359 |
18 | Minton Ag Co | Dexter, MO 63841 | $357,979 |
19 | Corbin Farms | Mound City, MO 64470 | $351,380 |
20 | C And C Farms | Clarkton, MO 63837 | $343,446 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>