Total Commodity Programs in Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 59,967
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Missouri totaled $352,269,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $4,493,266 |
2 | Southern Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $3,159,593 |
3 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $1,720,832 |
4 | Focus Bank ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,544,764 |
5 | First State Bank And Trust Branch ** | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $1,195,263 |
6 | Mcbee Family Farms | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $1,106,556 |
7 | First Missouri Bank Of Semo ** | Kennett, MO 63857 | $992,233 |
8 | Bank Of Missouri ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $838,738 |
9 | Alliance Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $793,114 |
10 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $676,001 |
11 | First Missouri State Bank ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63902 | $597,791 |
12 | Lowrey Farms | Parma, MO 63870 | $562,287 |
13 | Brown Brothers Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $437,784 |
14 | T And J Farms | Braggadocio, MO 63826 | $429,621 |
15 | Emerald Dairies LLC | Nevada, MO 64772 | $377,753 |
16 | Barry L Richardson Jr Farms | Marston, MO 63866 | $374,100 |
17 | Peters Orchards Inc | Waverly, MO 64096 | $366,342 |
18 | Parker Brothers Farm | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $345,589 |
19 | Ddab Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $344,841 |
20 | Niemeyer Family Farms | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $335,176 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>