Total Commodity Programs in Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 59,967
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Missouri totaled $352,269,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Montgomery Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $235,374 |
42 | Effertz Farms, LLC | Belton, MO 64012 | $233,659 |
43 | Seymour Poultry LLC | Seymour, MO 65746 | $230,254 |
44 | Whitworth Farms Inc | Worthington, MO 63567 | $228,706 |
45 | Ed Keeven Sod Company Inc | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $226,729 |
46 | Mrm Farms Partnership | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $223,350 |
47 | Mike's Turf Farm Inc | Raymore, MO 64083 | $223,156 |
48 | 3- C Farms | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $222,636 |
49 | Elizabeth Ann Riley | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $219,487 |
50 | Worrell Farms Partnership | Steele, MO 63877 | $219,043 |
51 | Jon & Deidre Thompson | Dexter, MO 63841 | $215,361 |
52 | Robinson Bros | Cooter, MO 63839 | $215,247 |
53 | Wright Brothers Partnership | Qulin, MO 63961 | $211,673 |
54 | Helt's Turf Farms, LLC | Pleasant Hill, MO 64080 | $209,716 |
55 | Keith Mayberry Farms | Essex, MO 63846 | $208,273 |
56 | Harris Farms | Senath, MO 63876 | $196,280 |
57 | Macon Atlanta State Bank ** | Macon, MO 63552 | $190,693 |
58 | Gary D Murphy II Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $190,635 |
59 | Jts Farms LLC | Golden City, MO 64748 | $189,853 |
60 | Bean Farms Partnership | Gideon, MO 63848 | $186,538 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”