Loan Deficiency in Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 65,790
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Missouri totaled $1,197,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jason & Otto Bean Partnership | Holcomb, MO 63852 | $484,761 |
62 | Harold Johnson Farms Inc | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $484,301 |
63 | C And C Farms | Clarkton, MO 63837 | $482,206 |
64 | Burnett Bros Farms | Parma, MO 63870 | $478,988 |
65 | Jack Pierce & Sons | De Kalb, MO 64440 | $477,885 |
66 | Moll Farms Inc | Saint Mary, MO 63673 | $472,809 |
67 | Bur Oak Farms | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $471,610 |
68 | Barry L Richardson Jr Farms | Marston, MO 63866 | $470,418 |
69 | Gremaud Farms | Perryville, MO 63775 | $469,867 |
70 | Pierce Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $469,515 |
71 | Jennings Bros Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $461,933 |
72 | Timothy Wayne Martin | Bernie, MO 63822 | $461,456 |
73 | John R & Janet Davis Joint Venture | Dudley, MO 63936 | $460,285 |
74 | Kaiser Farms Inc | Carrollton, MO 64633 | $459,747 |
75 | Griffin Farms | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $458,634 |
76 | Billy & Curtis Aycock | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $457,886 |
77 | Glen D Mcelwain | Butler, MO 64730 | $457,378 |
78 | Linda K Mcelwain | Butler, MO 64730 | $457,378 |
79 | Buttrey Farms | Fisk, MO 63940 | $451,195 |
80 | Carroll Family Farms Inc | Clarence, MO 63437 | $444,272 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”