Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,054
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Missouri totaled $22,925,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Martin Turner | Elmer, MO 63538 | $38,829 |
62 | Allen Claude Below | Parma, MO 63870 | $38,636 |
63 | R O Pierce | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $38,483 |
64 | Joan Collins | Mountain Grove, MO 65711 | $37,954 |
65 | Norbert F Mengwasser | Linn, MO 65051 | $37,893 |
66 | Treeland Inc | Fredericktown, MO 63645 | $37,375 |
67 | Kenneth Patty | Cassville, MO 65625 | $37,080 |
68 | Keil Farms Inc | Perry, MO 63462 | $36,675 |
69 | South Fork Farms Inc | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $36,564 |
70 | Frank Keehner | Mountain Grove, MO 65711 | $36,443 |
71 | Robert Stuppy | Rogers, AR 72758 | $36,400 |
72 | Trail Ridge Farms Inc | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $36,064 |
73 | David Copeland | Miami, MO 65344 | $35,969 |
74 | Dye Farms Inc | Paris, MO 65275 | $35,617 |
75 | Larry C Turner | Hartville, MO 65667 | $35,500 |
76 | Ken-lea Farms, Inc. | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $35,454 |
77 | Bruce & Evelyn Trussell Revocabe Trust | Tina, MO 64682 | $35,384 |
78 | Larry Ramaeker | Mountain Grove, MO 65711 | $35,000 |
79 | Robert Richardson | Norwood, MO 65717 | $35,000 |
80 | Edward Ray Smithey | Lebanon, MO 65536 | $34,893 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”