Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 25,121
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Missouri totaled $57,492,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Pascola Gin And Supply | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $72,228 |
82 | Belknap Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $72,176 |
83 | Jason E Cope Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $72,012 |
84 | S & L Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $71,760 |
85 | Jessie Carter Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $71,561 |
86 | Marty Vancil And Gentry Vancil | Campbell, MO 63933 | $71,318 |
87 | Larry Bradfield Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $71,187 |
88 | Earl Carter Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $70,972 |
89 | Jw Sullenger Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $68,400 |
90 | S & L Jackson Farm | Senath, MO 63876 | $68,372 |
91 | Sunrise Land Co | Kennett, MO 63857 | $66,266 |
92 | Pearson Farms | Matthews, MO 63867 | $66,094 |
93 | Jacob Allan Woolverton | Gideon, MO 63848 | $65,126 |
94 | Luye Farms | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $64,580 |
95 | Mike Flynn Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $63,896 |
96 | Worley Farms Partnership | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $63,788 |
97 | Patricia Jane Smody | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $62,505 |
98 | Michael Steven Smody | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $62,505 |
99 | Ling Farms LLC | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $62,442 |
100 | Stacy Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $62,273 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”