Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 37,320
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Missouri totaled $1,085,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Umb Na | Saint Louis, MO 63102 | $468,939 |
102 | Reid Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $466,854 |
103 | B & C Klipfel Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $465,066 |
104 | Hrb Farming Partnership | Mooresville, MO 64664 | $461,845 |
105 | Terry Scott Farms Partnership | Gobler, MO 63849 | $459,144 |
106 | Willow & Co | Bell City, MO 63735 | $456,924 |
107 | Varner Brothers Farms | Odessa, MO 64076 | $455,279 |
108 | Marty Vancil And Gentry Vancil | Campbell, MO 63933 | $453,908 |
109 | Jessie Carter Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $445,760 |
110 | South Fork Farms Inc | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $444,550 |
111 | J & S Farms | Clinton, MO 64735 | $444,065 |
112 | Clearview Farms | Fisk, MO 63940 | $433,550 |
113 | Stemme & Stemme Farms | Centralia, MO 65240 | $429,454 |
114 | Wub Riley Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $428,460 |
115 | Two B Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $428,191 |
116 | Kevin Carlisle Farms | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $427,033 |
117 | Tom Hampton Farms | Dudley, MO 63936 | $422,553 |
118 | Essner Brothers Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $421,671 |
119 | Buell Acres G P | Montgomery City, MO 63361 | $420,755 |
120 | The Callway Bank ** | Fulton, MO 65251 | $412,683 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”