Conservation Reserve Program in Missouri, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 62,866

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Missouri totaled $3,034,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
141Robert Dean DawsonBevier, MO 63532$821,665
142David GillilandLudlow, MO 64656$816,465
143Jack L And Linda L Reynolds JointLathrop, MO 64465$812,579
144Pieper Family Partnership LpO Fallon, MO 63366$812,567
145Christopher A BondererChillicothe, MO 64601$810,346
146Jerry Findley Revocable TrustAlbany, MO 64402$809,424
147Kenneth R SalsmanMacon, MO 63552$807,482
148Unionville Sportsman's Club IncWindom, MN 56101$806,595
149Donald IrelandBosworth, MO 64623$804,544
150Rollan SpilkerKidder, MO 64649$799,414
151Donald HughesDenver, MO 64441$799,337
152Margaret J FischerNorwalk, IA 50211$798,749
153Mark TempletonKingston, MO 64650$798,414
154Miller Bros Farm CorporationLenexa, KS 66215$797,816
155Gerald Parker Revocable TrustBethany, MO 64424$796,794
156Karol Anne ChickenGrant City, MO 64456$793,901
157J E Hess Rev Liv Trust Dated 11-22-02Maryville, MO 64468$793,412
158Esten WrightBosworth, MO 64623$792,982
159Nancy A Terry Rev TrustGallatin, MO 64640$792,878
160Carl FolgateRidgeway, MO 64481$792,855

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag