Grasslands Reserve Program in Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 616
Recipients of Grasslands Reserve Program from farms in Missouri totaled $7,428,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Grasslands Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Herbert E Stoermer | Cole Camp, MO 65325 | $13,860 |
162 | Jane E Adkins | Clinton, MO 64735 | $13,830 |
163 | Marjorie J Mccune Wilson | Jasper, MO 64755 | $13,803 |
164 | The Hosmer Ray Parsons Rev Living | Greenwood, MO 64034 | $13,756 |
165 | Jane Teel Roberts Irrevocable Tru | Nevada, MO 64772 | $13,716 |
166 | O D Merrifield | Florissant, MO 63031 | $13,680 |
167 | William E Killion | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $13,599 |
168 | Dennis L Foster | Green City, MO 63545 | $13,437 |
169 | Harry W Lehenbauer | Kingdom City, MO 65262 | $13,416 |
170 | Thomas Cheatham Irrevocable Trust | Kansas City, MO 64106 | $13,302 |
171 | R W Oelrichs | Cole Camp, MO 65325 | $13,149 |
172 | Donald Mabee | Lockwood, MO 65682 | $13,041 |
173 | Raymond Neill | Fair Play, MO 65649 | $13,034 |
174 | Allen Ray Herring | Carrollton, MO 64633 | $13,020 |
175 | Clifford Mahnken | Waverly, MO 64096 | $12,894 |
176 | Daniel Edwin Sharp | Paris, MO 65275 | $12,818 |
177 | Richard Dunton Weede Revocable Trust | Lexington, VA 24450 | $12,469 |
178 | Loel F Nance | Centerview, MO 64019 | $12,363 |
179 | Melba Conrad | Farmington, MO 63640 | $12,294 |
180 | Daniel A Davidson | Mexico, MO 65265 | $12,236 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”