Conservation Reserve Program in Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 62,866
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Missouri totaled $3,034,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Robert B Thompson | Nelson, MO 65347 | $791,577 |
162 | Robert Maasdam | Tina, MO 64682 | $791,044 |
163 | Beattie Farms Inc | Barnard, MO 64423 | $789,299 |
164 | Witten Farms Inc | Trenton, MO 64683 | $787,192 |
165 | Victor Gladbach | Marceline, MO 64658 | $786,042 |
166 | Mary C Liebhart Rev Trust | New Boston, MO 63557 | $784,616 |
167 | Cuthbert M Strong Family Trust | Gulf Breeze, FL 32562 | $784,054 |
168 | Gary W Christy | Humphreys, MO 64646 | $783,720 |
169 | Benjamin Tobin | King City, MO 64463 | $781,392 |
170 | Brian Hunt | Braymer, MO 64624 | $781,134 |
171 | Ward Sperry Inc | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $780,197 |
172 | Robert E Sabin | Spring Hill, KS 66083 | $778,697 |
173 | Rickey J Findley Family Trust | Bethany, MO 64424 | $778,238 |
174 | Tiger Farms LLC | Columbia, MO 65203 | $777,643 |
175 | Briggs Farms Inc | Eagleville, MO 64442 | $777,568 |
176 | Delmar Franklin Florea | Kahoka, MO 63445 | $774,382 |
177 | Monroe Adams | Mount Clemens, MI 48043 | $773,681 |
178 | Michael Franke | Novelty, MO 63460 | $771,081 |
179 | Donald Robert Hoover | Saint Catharine, MO 64628 | $770,973 |
180 | Albert J Batson Sr | Galt, MO 64641 | $770,235 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”