Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 7,104
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Missouri totaled $12,076,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brown Brothers Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $61,736 |
2 | Whitworth Farms Inc | Worthington, MO 63567 | $59,164 |
3 | Chariton Group | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $57,366 |
4 | Pine View Pork Inc | King City, MO 64463 | $51,402 |
5 | M & M Ag Investments | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $46,278 |
6 | Rockin' R Farms Inc | Lucerne, MO 64655 | $45,586 |
7 | Riegel Dairy, Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $44,238 |
8 | Patrick Hulshof Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $41,187 |
9 | P & D Farms Inc | Moberly, MO 65270 | $41,053 |
10 | Layne Partnership | Arbyrd, MO 63821 | $38,520 |
11 | Thompson Farms Inc | Stewartsville, MO 64490 | $38,515 |
12 | Grm Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $37,122 |
13 | Gerald Malin Jr Farms | Campbell, MO 63933 | $36,967 |
14 | Ensor Brothers | Holliday, MO 65258 | $36,864 |
15 | Mark A And Connie S Siebert - Siebert Farms | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $36,126 |
16 | Gary D Murphy II Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $35,690 |
17 | Donnie Underwood Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $34,738 |
18 | Gary Murphy Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $34,682 |
19 | Rival Properties | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $33,109 |
20 | Miles Farms Partnership | Marshall, MO 65340 | $32,752 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>