Farm Subsidy information
Missouri
Total Subsidies in Missouri, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 57,857
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Missouri totaled $1,261,000,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | M & K Farms | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $560,138 |
| 62 | Jason E Cope Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $539,739 |
| 63 | Donald E Masters Farms | Arbyrd, MO 63821 | $539,410 |
| 64 | Yarick Farms | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $537,234 |
| 65 | Whitworth Farms Inc | Worthington, MO 63567 | $523,231 |
| 66 | Davault Arkmo Farms | Paragould, AR 72450 | $512,548 |
| 67 | B Dawson Planting Company | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $511,922 |
| 68 | Earl Carter Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $508,256 |
| 69 | Gastler Bros Farming | Martinsburg, MO 65264 | $507,891 |
| 70 | Campbell Farms | Cooter, MO 63839 | $505,932 |
| 71 | Randy Allnutt Farms | Trenton, MO 64683 | $504,881 |
| 72 | Dye Brothers Partnership | Paris, MO 65275 | $503,862 |
| 73 | Edward Theodore Farms | Las Vegas, NV 89113 | $500,727 |
| 74 | Rick Branch Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $499,838 |
| 75 | Honey Creek Ranch LLC | Independence, MO 64056 | $495,557 |
| 76 | J S P Farms | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $491,820 |
| 77 | Odle Planting Co | Senath, MO 63876 | $489,226 |
| 78 | First National Bank ** | Paragould, AR 72451 | $485,784 |
| 79 | Larry Bradfield Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $484,384 |
| 80 | B & C Klipfel Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $482,631 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf