Farm Subsidy information
Missouri
Total Subsidies in Missouri, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 57,857
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Missouri totaled $1,261,000,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Steven M Walker Farms Partnership | Steele, MO 63877 | $481,388 |
82 | Payton Farms Inc | Platte City, MO 64079 | $479,338 |
83 | Citizens Bank Of Edina ** | Edina, MO 63537 | $469,742 |
84 | Taylor Farms | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $469,050 |
85 | Randy Jay Price | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $466,246 |
86 | Douglas J Nalle | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $465,491 |
87 | R J S Burke Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $465,075 |
88 | Mcbee Farms Lc | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $464,357 |
89 | Haskell Family Partnership | Paris, MO 65275 | $458,536 |
90 | Steve & Lynn Kellams Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $457,701 |
91 | 3 G Farms | Leachville, AR 72438 | $455,822 |
92 | Ricky Parker Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $451,474 |
93 | Wub Riley Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $447,041 |
94 | Thompson Farms Inc | Stewartsville, MO 64490 | $446,214 |
95 | Jessie Carter Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $440,701 |
96 | Effertz Farms, LLC | Belton, MO 64012 | $438,942 |
97 | Marty Vancil And Gentry Vancil | Campbell, MO 63933 | $429,630 |
98 | Kevin Carlisle Farms | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $427,690 |
99 | Fowler Farms Inc | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $427,271 |
100 | Wayne Johnson Farms | Spickard, MO 64679 | $423,474 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”