Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,628
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Missouri totaled $3,679,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Payton Farms Inc | Platte City, MO 64079 | $124,115 |
| 2 | Russel Farms, LLC | Forest City, MO 64451 | $90,912 |
| 3 | Riverbottom Farms LLC | Falls City, NE 68355 | $80,727 |
| 4 | Daniel Wade Kuschel | Morrison, MO 65061 | $58,962 |
| 5 | David Thomas Laur | Tarkio, MO 64491 | $49,781 |
| 6 | Suzan Jo Laur | Tarkio, MO 64491 | $49,780 |
| 7 | Gfg Ag Finance LLC ** | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $47,411 |
| 8 | Wyatt Cole Mayberry | Essex, MO 63846 | $46,165 |
| 9 | Wright Atherton Farms LLC | Richmond, MO 64085 | $36,578 |
| 10 | Jbs Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $34,226 |
| 11 | Brian Shramek Farms | Kingdom City, MO 65262 | $33,845 |
| 12 | Bernard Mark Nuelle | Higginsville, MO 64037 | $31,471 |
| 13 | Rogers Strickland | Weston, MO 64098 | $30,971 |
| 14 | Brazel Land & Timber LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $29,608 |
| 15 | Gary Lee Haer | Weston, MO 64098 | $28,604 |
| 16 | Whitehead Farms LLC | Sidney, IA 51652 | $28,582 |
| 17 | Focus Bank ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $28,006 |
| 18 | Hoss Matthews Farms LLC | Norborne, MO 64668 | $26,124 |
| 19 | Mark Templeton | Kingston, MO 64650 | $26,061 |
| 20 | David W Locke | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $23,879 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf