Total Commodity Programs in Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 174,973
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Missouri totaled $9,218,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Effertz Farms, LLC | Belton, MO 64012 | $3,191,748 |
82 | Layne Partnership | Arbyrd, MO 63821 | $3,161,725 |
83 | Keller Farms Inc | Dexter, MO 63841 | $3,147,217 |
84 | T And J Farms | Braggadocio, MO 63826 | $3,125,782 |
85 | Billy & Curtis Aycock | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $3,095,751 |
86 | Kirby & Sons | Liberal, MO 64762 | $3,094,994 |
87 | 4 D Ranch | Plattsburg, MO 64477 | $3,081,953 |
88 | Terry Scott Farms Partnership | Gobler, MO 63849 | $3,066,096 |
89 | Nichols Farms LLC | Bell City, MO 63735 | $3,062,115 |
90 | Stallings Brothers | Charleston, MO 63834 | $3,027,873 |
91 | Turnage Farms | Hayti, MO 63851 | $3,019,885 |
92 | Craig Hunter Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $3,018,604 |
93 | Donald F Underwood Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $2,986,561 |
94 | James Mark Kelley | Essex, MO 63846 | $2,968,263 |
95 | Weathers Farms | Essex, MO 63846 | $2,966,038 |
96 | Keasler Farms Inc | Parma, MO 63870 | $2,958,471 |
97 | Jeff Stone Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $2,942,883 |
98 | James W And M Kelley Corporation | Essex, MO 63846 | $2,939,515 |
99 | Doyle Junior Strickland | Essex, MO 63846 | $2,934,744 |
100 | Wayne Johnson Farms | Spickard, MO 64679 | $2,919,498 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”