Counter Cyclical Program in Andrew County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 810
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Andrew County, Missouri totaled $2,946,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John Randall Osborn | Savannah, MO 64485 | $15,794 |
42 | Geary Allen Chambers | Rea, MO 64480 | $15,287 |
43 | Larry Peterson | Clarksdale, MO 64430 | $15,102 |
44 | Ronald Lee Patterson | Fillmore, MO 64449 | $14,937 |
45 | Kellogg Creek Inc | Rosendale, MO 64483 | $14,852 |
46 | Hannah Farms Inc | Platte City, MO 64079 | $14,377 |
47 | William Robert Cobb | Saint Joseph, MO 64505 | $14,266 |
48 | Laverne Rutherford | Fillmore, MO 64449 | $14,203 |
49 | Uehlin Farms Inc | Amazonia, MO 64421 | $14,049 |
50 | Hegeman Farm Inc | Cosby, MO 64436 | $13,641 |
51 | Lawrence R Schnitker | Union Star, MO 64494 | $13,557 |
52 | Poverty Ridge Farms Inc | Rea, MO 64480 | $13,468 |
53 | Townsend Brothers | Rosendale, MO 64483 | $13,408 |
54 | Cawood Farms Inc | Bolckow, MO 64427 | $13,352 |
55 | Robert J Grishow | Rosendale, MO 64483 | $12,999 |
56 | Carl Richard Townsend | Rosendale, MO 64483 | $12,858 |
57 | Schweizer Farms Inc | Amazonia, MO 64421 | $12,425 |
58 | Saunders Cattle Company, Inc | Rea, MO 64480 | $12,398 |
59 | Curtis Alan Adkins | Savannah, MO 64485 | $12,256 |
60 | Darin Gilbert | King City, MO 64463 | $12,175 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”