Conservation Reserve Program in Atchison County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 511
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Atchison County, Missouri totaled $21,424,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | J L Houts | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $139,914 |
42 | Donald E Poe And Jarra L Poe Livi | La Vista, NE 68128 | $139,807 |
43 | Tom Hopkins | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $138,157 |
44 | Richard Duane Clement | Tarkio, MO 64491 | $131,367 |
45 | Joyce Irene Harbin | Tarkio, MO 64491 | $129,380 |
46 | Craig A Heits | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $128,112 |
47 | Robert B Erwin | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $125,532 |
48 | Fourteen Pines Corp | Irving, TX 75060 | $122,095 |
49 | Patricia Stevens | Westboro, MO 64498 | $116,432 |
50 | John W Stoner | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $116,216 |
51 | Pearson Family Trust | Seal Beach, CA 90740 | $116,062 |
52 | Morris Family Revocable Trust | Portageville, MO 63873 | $113,987 |
53 | Ggs-buck Farms LLC | Omaha, NE 68137 | $113,354 |
54 | Steve Potter | Shawnee Mission, KS 66207 | $110,409 |
55 | Frieda M Stevens | Westboro, MO 64498 | $105,947 |
56 | David Thomas Laur | Tarkio, MO 64491 | $104,609 |
57 | Dale E Grubb | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $104,250 |
58 | Houts Bayview Farm LLC | Weldon Spring, MO 63304 | $103,858 |
59 | , | $103,443 | |
60 | Donald E Poe And Jarra Lee Poe Living Trust | Lavista, NE 68128 | $100,856 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”