Total Conservation Programs in Atchison County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 142
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Atchison County, Missouri totaled $860,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | L C Hill Heirs | Council Bluffs, IA 51503 | $1,919 |
82 | B F Hill Heirs | Council Bluffs, IA 51503 | $1,919 |
83 | Steve Lininger | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $1,778 |
84 | Glen Henry Morris | Mound City, MO 64470 | $1,712 |
85 | William Frederick Heitman | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $1,607 |
86 | Robert Lorenz | Omaha, NE 68154 | $1,597 |
87 | Tony Mckenney | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $1,587 |
88 | James D Holtz | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $1,562 |
89 | Loren F Ebert & M Joan Ebert Family Trust | Canton, IL 61520 | $1,512 |
90 | Stevens Farm Partnership | Westboro, MO 64498 | $1,490 |
91 | Jean Good Revocable Trust | West Des Moines, IA 50266 | $1,439 |
92 | Northwest Missouri Farms LLC | Marshall, MO 65340 | $1,344 |
93 | Lonnie Eugene Herron | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $1,339 |
94 | Michael Shawn Rolf | Westboro, MO 64498 | $1,281 |
95 | Cynthia Jean Rolf | Westboro, MO 64498 | $1,281 |
96 | John C Carlson Family Trust | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $1,278 |
97 | Jared Wayne Meyerkorth | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $1,136 |
98 | Janice Phillips | Shenandoah, IA 51601 | $1,110 |
99 | Glenn Implement Co | Westboro, MO 64498 | $1,095 |
100 | Barbara I Young | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $1,071 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”