Farm Subsidy information
Atchison County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Atchison County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 676
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Atchison County, Missouri totaled $17,380,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Michael A Heits | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $21,914 |
122 | Stephen D Meyerkorth | College Station, TX 77845 | $21,775 |
123 | Robert Dean Vette | Westboro, MO 64498 | $21,616 |
124 | Daniel Phillip Beckman | Watson, MO 64496 | $21,471 |
125 | Joni True | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $21,379 |
126 | Jill D Niece | Maysville, MO 64469 | $21,379 |
127 | Has Farms Inc | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $21,238 |
128 | James W Schooler | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $20,786 |
129 | Phyllis Jane Ottmann | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $20,746 |
130 | Nodaway Valley Bank ** | Maryville, MO 64468 | $20,638 |
131 | Lindsey Lanae Barnes | Westboro, MO 64498 | $20,286 |
132 | Spencer Combs Barnes | Westboro, MO 64498 | $20,286 |
133 | Roberta-roberta Sharlene Peeler Trust Peeler | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $20,089 |
134 | Max Peeler | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $20,088 |
135 | Richard Ralph Oswald | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $19,912 |
136 | Robert Sefrit | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $19,859 |
137 | Oswald & Company LLC | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $19,805 |
138 | Samuel Bruce Graves III | Tarkio, MO 64491 | $19,777 |
139 | Robert Harvey Schooler | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $19,544 |
140 | Jonathan Lucas | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $19,166 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”