Total Commodity Programs in Atchison County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 566
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Atchison County, Missouri totaled $5,224,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Drb Construction Inc | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $14,339 |
122 | J & W Rolf Inc | Westboro, MO 64498 | $14,216 |
123 | Bill W Woodward | Hamburg, IA 51640 | $13,931 |
124 | Richard Chance Esser | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $13,913 |
125 | Gary Wayne Jackson | Northboro, IA 51647 | $13,865 |
126 | Clay Douglas Knierim | Tarkio, MO 64491 | $13,534 |
127 | Barry Amthor | Tarkio, MO 64491 | $13,133 |
128 | Jeffrey Don Williams | Westboro, MO 64498 | $13,059 |
129 | Herbert D Sutter & Anita K Sutter Rev Trust | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $12,726 |
130 | David Bryan White | Tarkio, MO 64491 | $12,570 |
131 | Portis Inc | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $12,507 |
132 | Daniel Curry | Savannah, MO 64485 | $12,507 |
133 | T L G Inc | Westboro, MO 64498 | $12,490 |
134 | L & V Farms | Tarkio, MO 64491 | $12,484 |
135 | Richard Athen & Janet Athen Rev Familytrust | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $12,270 |
136 | Garry Brian Kelly | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $12,071 |
137 | Greg D Wennihan | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $12,054 |
138 | Max Peeler | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $11,975 |
139 | Roberta-roberta Sharlene Peeler Trust Peeler | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $11,975 |
140 | Judith Ann Poppa | Branson, MO 65616 | $11,963 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”