Conservation Reserve Program in Atchison County, Missouri, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 162
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Atchison County, Missouri totaled $840,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Margie E Burch Stock Trust | Kansas City, MO 64152 | $5,776 |
42 | Allen Living Trust | Tarkio, MO 64491 | $5,369 |
43 | Daniel W Stanton | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $5,154 |
44 | Walter Fms Inc | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $5,122 |
45 | J & W Rolf Inc | Westboro, MO 64498 | $4,881 |
46 | Kay Gibson | Watson, MO 64496 | $4,846 |
47 | H Lusby Trust | Hamburg, IA 51640 | $4,749 |
48 | Michael Dane Graves | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $4,716 |
49 | Stanley K Griffin | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $4,652 |
50 | Lonnie Eugene Herron | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $4,325 |
51 | Jeffrey Dean Hall | Westboro, MO 64498 | $4,223 |
52 | Fourteen Pines Corp | Irving, TX 75060 | $4,202 |
53 | Diana Bentley Brown Revoc Trust | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $4,093 |
54 | Julia B Lahue Revoc Trust | Lexington, MO 64067 | $4,093 |
55 | Jonathan Lucas | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $4,063 |
56 | Ann Stapel Strauss Revocable Trust | Dunwoody, GA 30338 | $3,807 |
57 | Marilyn J Graves Revocable Trust | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $3,697 |
58 | Holly Barnes | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $3,564 |
59 | Tracy Barnes | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $3,564 |
60 | Rowena Broermann | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $3,554 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”