Deficiency Payment in Barton County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 610
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Barton County, Missouri totaled $577,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ronald Means | Lamar, MO 64759 | $2,307 |
62 | Max Stratton | Golden City, MO 64748 | $2,296 |
63 | Linden Max Rose | Liberal, MO 64762 | $2,270 |
64 | Earl Clifton Dumm | Lamar, MO 64759 | $2,264 |
65 | Harvey R Letton Rev Trust | Lamar, MO 64759 | $2,260 |
66 | Bruce Lyle Barker | Liberal, MO 64762 | $2,239 |
67 | Mark Stewart Peterson | Liberal, MO 64762 | $2,211 |
68 | Lloyd Berryhill | Jasper, MO 64755 | $2,184 |
69 | James Gastel | Jasper, MO 64755 | $2,175 |
70 | Edward Russell Onstott | Lamar, MO 64759 | $2,163 |
71 | John Bauer | Lamar, MO 64759 | $2,155 |
72 | Ann Vonier | Grove, OK 74344 | $2,149 |
73 | Donald Wayne Costley | Lamar, MO 64759 | $2,123 |
74 | Darrel R Crockett Revocable Trust | Sheldon, MO 64784 | $2,080 |
75 | Richard Charles Gastel | Bend, OR 97701 | $2,046 |
76 | Bruce Wolf | Liberal, MO 64762 | $2,007 |
77 | Ted Chris Waldbuesser | Jasper, MO 64755 | $1,986 |
78 | Larry Compton | Lamar, MO 64759 | $1,958 |
79 | Linard Lawrence Trust Delet | Lamar, MO 64759 | $1,923 |
80 | Wallace Norton Sr Revocable Trust | Lamar, MO 64759 | $1,885 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”