Farm Subsidy information
Barton County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Barton County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,830
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Barton County, Missouri totaled $293,171,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Larry Compton | Lamar, MO 64759 | $509,816 |
82 | Sprenkle Family Farms LLC | Lamar, MO 64759 | $508,006 |
83 | Tim A Braker | Lamar, MO 64759 | $505,634 |
84 | Gene Banwart Farm Inc | Liberal, MO 64762 | $488,920 |
85 | Randall Lee Sprenkle | Lamar, MO 64759 | $468,250 |
86 | James Terry Cook | Jasper, MO 64755 | $468,095 |
87 | Bryan Robertson | Lamar, MO 64759 | $466,954 |
88 | Wesley Ray Meadows | Liberal, MO 64762 | $461,935 |
89 | Neil Robertson | Lamar, MO 64759 | $454,620 |
90 | Paul Helms Revocable Living Trust | Mindenmines, MO 64769 | $451,583 |
91 | John R Lawrence | Lamar, MO 64759 | $450,717 |
92 | Lester Gordon Dingman | Liberal, MO 64762 | $447,575 |
93 | Braker Ag LLC | Liberal, MO 64762 | $447,441 |
94 | Emerald Dairies LLC | Nevada, MO 64772 | $445,136 |
95 | Douglas Dee Mckibben | Lamar, MO 64759 | $445,093 |
96 | Larry Wayne Crockett | Lamar, MO 64759 | $441,680 |
97 | Ronald Means | Lamar, MO 64759 | $440,092 |
98 | R & S Bunton Inc | Liberal, MO 64762 | $439,347 |
99 | Lyle G Barker & Evelyn J Barker R | Liberal, MO 64762 | $434,930 |
100 | Edward George Weaver | Liberal, MO 64762 | $428,248 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”