Farm Subsidy information
Barton County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Barton County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 649
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Barton County, Missouri totaled $18,561,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mcculloch Farms LLC | Lamar, MO 64759 | $24,397 |
102 | Ronald L Hampton | Liberal, MO 64762 | $23,778 |
103 | Lawrence Luthi | Liberal, MO 64762 | $23,372 |
104 | Kyle Morey | Lamar, MO 64759 | $23,028 |
105 | Brian Williams | Lamar, MO 64759 | $22,402 |
106 | Rick Fast | Liberal, MO 64762 | $21,938 |
107 | Robert Selvey | Lamar, MO 64759 | $21,493 |
108 | Thomas R Kohley Revocable Trust | Liberal, MO 64762 | $20,921 |
109 | Ronald Means | Lamar, MO 64759 | $20,432 |
110 | Rex Lee Mckay | Liberal, MO 64762 | $20,407 |
111 | Linden Max Rose | Liberal, MO 64762 | $20,195 |
112 | Central States Cattle Company LLC | Lamar, MO 64759 | $20,137 |
113 | Henry Morgan | Lamar, MO 64759 | $20,065 |
114 | George E Sheat And Patricia S Sheat Irrevocable Tr | Kansas City, MO 64131 | $19,784 |
115 | John Kremp | Lamar, MO 64759 | $19,772 |
116 | Nathan S Crabtree | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $19,767 |
117 | Marshall Dean Miller | Lamar, MO 64759 | $19,741 |
118 | Rick Morgan | Lamar, MO 64759 | $19,566 |
119 | Gail Miller | Lamar, MO 64759 | $19,416 |
120 | , | $18,996 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”