Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Barton County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 50
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Barton County, Missouri totaled $68,325 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Joanna Smith | Lamar, MO 64759 | $17,500 |
2 | R J Braker & Sons Inc | Jasper, MO 64755 | $4,542 |
3 | Overman & Son Partnership | Liberal, MO 64762 | $3,163 |
4 | Charles E Cook | Liberal, MO 64762 | $2,599 |
5 | Sei Partners Lp | Leawood, KS 66209 | $2,563 |
6 | John C Gastel Irrevocable Trust | Jasper, MO 64755 | $2,413 |
7 | Curtis Kellenberger | Lamar, MO 64759 | $2,315 |
8 | Gene Banwart Farm Inc | Liberal, MO 64762 | $1,937 |
9 | Gene Gastel Farms Inc | Jasper, MO 64755 | $1,817 |
10 | Dale Marti | Lamar, MO 64759 | $1,690 |
11 | John Parker | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $1,579 |
12 | Dorothy L Defreese Rev Liv Trust | Sheldon, MO 64784 | $1,553 |
13 | Harry Krug | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $1,506 |
14 | Thomas R Kohley Revocable Trust | Liberal, MO 64762 | $1,487 |
15 | Gary Dumm Living Trust | Jasper, MO 64755 | $1,486 |
16 | George Brock | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $1,293 |
17 | Rodney Bunton | Liberal, MO 64762 | $1,263 |
18 | Richard Morgan | Lamar, MO 64759 | $1,183 |
19 | Loren E Morey | Lamar, MO 64759 | $1,169 |
20 | Larry Wayne Crockett | Lamar, MO 64759 | $1,169 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>