Farm Subsidy information
Barton County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Barton County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,830
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Barton County, Missouri totaled $293,171,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kirby & Sons | Liberal, MO 64762 | $3,800,807 |
2 | John Gardner Farms Inc | Liberal, MO 64762 | $2,499,844 |
3 | Overman & Son Partnership | Liberal, MO 64762 | $2,382,793 |
4 | Mark Stewart Peterson | Liberal, MO 64762 | $2,346,517 |
5 | Kelsey Farms Inc | Mindenmines, MO 64769 | $1,611,745 |
6 | Lawrence Land Co Inc | Lamar, MO 64759 | $1,483,801 |
7 | Carl E Selvey | Lamar, MO 64759 | $1,477,389 |
8 | Lendery Lane Farms Inc | Lamar, MO 64759 | $1,443,529 |
9 | R J Braker & Sons Inc | Jasper, MO 64755 | $1,279,458 |
10 | Jk Meadows Farms LLC | Liberal, MO 64762 | $1,255,722 |
11 | Carl Compton | Lamar, MO 64759 | $1,201,927 |
12 | Bunton Farms Inc | Lamar, MO 64759 | $1,147,831 |
13 | Roger Alan Marti | Liberal, MO 64762 | $1,140,964 |
14 | Ron Olee Bean | Liberal, MO 64762 | $1,134,337 |
15 | William Aaron Griffitt Jr | Lamar, MO 64759 | $1,133,435 |
16 | Wayne Dingman | Liberal, MO 64762 | $1,131,495 |
17 | Curtis Kellenberger | Lamar, MO 64759 | $1,041,947 |
18 | Braker Brothers Inc | Jasper, MO 64755 | $1,009,005 |
19 | Kerry Rose | Liberal, MO 64762 | $1,008,931 |
20 | Lawrence Luthi | Liberal, MO 64762 | $982,481 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>