Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Bates County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 547
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $22,852,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dbs Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $156,545 |
42 | Brown Farms Eddie Inc | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $154,182 |
43 | Charles Engelhardt | Adrian, MO 64720 | $153,251 |
44 | Bradford Scott Dirks | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $150,192 |
45 | Nieder Farms LLC | Amsterdam, MO 64723 | $149,430 |
46 | Jim Tenholder | Butler, MO 64730 | $149,256 |
47 | Saathoff Farms | Adrian, MO 64720 | $149,048 |
48 | Clayton William Mcelwain | Butler, MO 64730 | $147,642 |
49 | Dalton Mcelwain Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $145,733 |
50 | Robert A Christopher | Butler, MO 64730 | $144,162 |
51 | Herb Brownsberger | Butler, MO 64730 | $138,826 |
52 | Michelle Lynn Brownsberger | Butler, MO 64730 | $138,826 |
53 | James Brian Cox | Butler, MO 64730 | $138,218 |
54 | Mark Edwin Nelson | Amoret, MO 64722 | $131,519 |
55 | M & W Farms Inc | Butler, MO 64730 | $131,495 |
56 | Jacqueline E Mcelwain-hill | Butler, MO 64730 | $130,989 |
57 | Devern Ray Koehn | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $129,007 |
58 | Mcelwain Land And Cattle LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $127,133 |
59 | Jungerman Family Irrevocable Trus | Harwood, MO 64750 | $125,000 |
60 | Mcelwain Bros LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $124,505 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”