Farm Subsidy information
Bates County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Bates County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 774
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $21,192,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dane Otto Diehl | Butler, MO 64730 | $32,356 |
62 | Michael John Rapp | Rockville, MO 64780 | $32,291 |
63 | Lindsay Jennifer Mcelwain | Butler, MO 64730 | $31,819 |
64 | Larry Craft | Butler, MO 64730 | $31,574 |
65 | Meredith G Yarick - Yarick Revocable Trust | Hume, MO 64752 | $31,122 |
66 | David And Nicole Thurman Farms LLC | Archie, MO 64725 | $30,969 |
67 | Ferguson Land & Cattle Company LLC | Adrian, MO 64720 | $30,556 |
68 | Clay Gene Lindsay | Amoret, MO 64722 | $30,535 |
69 | Jerry Stangel | Rockville, MO 64780 | $30,163 |
70 | Stanley Stark | Adrian, MO 64720 | $29,550 |
71 | , | $29,177 | |
72 | Sharon Ellen Mcelwain | Butler, MO 64730 | $29,143 |
73 | Kevin L Fischer | Rockville, MO 64780 | $29,140 |
74 | Jared Dwain Anstine | Holden, MO 64040 | $29,048 |
75 | Kauffman Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $28,597 |
76 | Donnohue Farms | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $28,427 |
77 | Ryan Nitchals | Butler, MO 64730 | $27,969 |
78 | Raymond Mark Nitchals | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $27,953 |
79 | Dalton Mcelwain | Butler, MO 64730 | $27,839 |
80 | Mike L Durst | Butler, MO 64730 | $27,546 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”