Counter Cyclical Program in Bates County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,092
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $2,929,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | James E Hess | Hume, MO 64752 | $12,654 |
62 | Paul Ivan Cumpton | Adrian, MO 64720 | $12,583 |
63 | Thomas E Paxton | Butler, MO 64730 | $12,554 |
64 | Dale Cumpton | Adrian, MO 64720 | $12,545 |
65 | Steele & King Farms Inc | Butler, MO 64730 | $12,435 |
66 | Leslie Dell Nation | Butler, MO 64730 | $12,301 |
67 | Crawford Farms Inc | Amsterdam, MO 64723 | $12,080 |
68 | Willow Branch Farms Inc | Rockville, MO 64780 | $12,067 |
69 | Seba Bros Partnership LLC | Cleveland, MO 64734 | $12,016 |
70 | Francis Phillip Lesmeister | Butler, MO 64730 | $11,959 |
71 | Robert Dean Arnold | Drexel, MO 64742 | $11,849 |
72 | Clayton William Mcelwain | Butler, MO 64730 | $11,384 |
73 | Rex William Griffith | Montrose, MO 64770 | $11,374 |
74 | Raymond Otto Diehl | Butler, MO 64730 | $11,275 |
75 | Gary Schmidt | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $11,232 |
76 | Duane Harkrader | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $11,029 |
77 | Elvis Edwin Nelson | Amsterdam, MO 64723 | $10,928 |
78 | Clifford G Rapp | Rockville, MO 64780 | $10,897 |
79 | Jerry Stangel | Rockville, MO 64780 | $10,868 |
80 | Vanderman Farms Inc | Adrian, MO 64720 | $10,857 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”