Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Bates County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 783
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $1,564,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Tim Pannell | Lees Summit, MO 64082 | $5,284 |
82 | Dean Fischer Farms Inc | Butler, MO 64730 | $5,269 |
83 | Paul Martin Rapp | Rockville, MO 64780 | $5,156 |
84 | Brett Allan Harkrader | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $5,092 |
85 | Jim Tenholder | Butler, MO 64730 | $5,052 |
86 | Jerry R Reed | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $5,034 |
87 | Sns Farms LLC | Adrian, MO 64720 | $5,030 |
88 | Charles Shane Burch | Butler, MO 64730 | $5,016 |
89 | Delbert Wilson | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $4,869 |
90 | Timothy W Rapp | Rockville, MO 64780 | $4,869 |
91 | Casey J Osborne | Adrian, MO 64720 | $4,867 |
92 | Dalton Mcelwain Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $4,861 |
93 | Mickey N Hellwig | Butler, MO 64730 | $4,802 |
94 | Leland R Burch | Butler, MO 64730 | $4,787 |
95 | Lbl Seider Farms | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $4,599 |
96 | Michael C Black | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $4,574 |
97 | Linda Sue Jennings | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $4,567 |
98 | David G Merryfield | Butler, MO 64730 | $4,564 |
99 | Brad Steuck | Hume, MO 64752 | $4,563 |
100 | Galen M Steuck | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $4,553 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”